Audience
Company workspace knowledge and public-facing content are separate audiences.
See how Zipplee separates company information, puts publishing decisions in human hands, and documents its providers and data lifecycle.
Ask how Zipplee handles data or request the documentation your team needs for a review. Contact Todd with questions about data handling, access, AI providers, or the published policies.
From a source document to an employee answer or a published page, Zipplee is designed to make the relevant choices legible to the team using it.
Company workspace knowledge and public-facing content are separate audiences.
Publications can move through draft, submission, HR approval, and version history.
AI features use documented providers; connected provider accounts carry their own terms.
Supported workflows and mandates expose approval choices.
Explore how Zipplee organizes company knowledge, separates audiences, and supports review before information is shared.
Review the current sub-processor record to understand the service providers involved in operating Zipplee and the role each one plays.
View sub-processors ↗Keep content in its company workspace, choose the intended audience, and publish employee-facing material deliberately.
Explore knowledge controls ↗The Approvals screen records draft, pending, approved, and rejected publication states. Editing approved content returns it to draft for another review.
Explore communications ↗Our published data-retention policy explains the current lifecycle and deletion-request process. Contract terms and policy language govern the details.
Read data retention ↗Teams choose source material and audiences. A person should check AI-generated work before publishing it; AI Concierge can show the source document for an answer.
Source Choose the company material that belongs in the experience.
Review Check generated work and approve what should be published.
Use Give people access through the experience and audience you intend.
These documents open on the Zipplee app domain. The Terms of Service and Data Processing Agreement are templates for counsel review; the sub-processor list and retention policy describe the published current position.
If your question is specific to a rollout or agreement, email us and we’ll help direct it to the right material.
[email protected]No. Our SOC 2 program is underway with Thoropass; the first milestone is complete.
Yes. The Terms and DPA are review templates; the current sub-processor list and retention policy are also linked above. Contact [email protected] about the documents for your agreement.
Teams choose their approved source material and review generated work before publishing. Where supported, connected provider accounts are subject to that provider’s account terms and usage charges.
Read the published retention policy, then email [email protected] to request deletion. We verify requests and may coordinate with an employer for data in its account.
Tell us what your team needs to evaluate, and we’ll help identify the current product and policy materials.